(02-01-2026, 01:35 AM)Xkrode Wrote: roblox fell off so hard

---

roblox fell off so hard

(02-04-2026, 09:05 PM)ClinkItsNicko Wrote: RIP Classic Avatars (2005 - 2025)

(02-04-2026, 09:07 PM)mnep5 Wrote:

(02-04-2026, 09:05 PM)ClinkItsNicko Wrote: RIP Classic Avatars (2005 - 2025)

I think roblox is changing their minds, also its 2026

(02-07-2026, 03:12 AM)Noova Wrote: I don't really care if they do this as long as the dynamic version and the classic are completely identical which hasn't been the case

(02-07-2026, 11:36 AM)mnep5 Wrote:

(02-07-2026, 03:12 AM)Noova Wrote: I don't really care if they do this as long as the dynamic version and the classic are completely identical which hasn't been the case

they are NOT identical

(02-08-2026, 07:03 AM)Noova Wrote:

(02-07-2026, 11:36 AM)mnep5 Wrote:

(02-07-2026, 03:12 AM)Noova Wrote: I don't really care if they do this as long as the dynamic version and the classic are completely identical which hasn't been the case

they are NOT identical

redundant

(02-09-2026, 06:30 AM)Noova Wrote: I mean Roblox has said they won't remove R6 but how can you trust them

(02-10-2026, 05:09 PM)mnep5 Wrote:

(02-09-2026, 06:30 AM)Noova Wrote: I mean Roblox has said they won't remove R6 but how can you trust them

watch as they still do

(02-13-2026, 06:38 AM)Noova Wrote:

(02-10-2026, 05:09 PM)mnep5 Wrote:

(02-09-2026, 06:30 AM)Noova Wrote: I mean Roblox has said they won't remove R6 but how can you trust them

watch as they still do

you sound like helmut

(02-14-2026, 06:44 PM)mnep5 Wrote:

(02-13-2026, 06:38 AM)Noova Wrote:

(02-10-2026, 05:09 PM)mnep5 Wrote:

(02-09-2026, 06:30 AM)Noova Wrote: I mean Roblox has said they won't remove R6 but how can you trust them

watch as they still do

you sound like helmut

lies

(02-21-2026, 04:51 AM)Noova Wrote:

(02-14-2026, 06:44 PM)mnep5 Wrote:

(02-13-2026, 06:38 AM)Noova Wrote:

(02-10-2026, 05:09 PM)mnep5 Wrote:

(02-09-2026, 06:30 AM)Noova Wrote: I mean Roblox has said they won't remove R6 but how can you trust them

watch as they still do

you sound like helmut

lies

'Watch as' is straight out of the Helmut textbook

(03-20-2026, 11:59 AM)Noova Wrote: Since partnering with that company to ensure the accuracy of the faces they have made them identical so this update isn't really an issue atp

(03-22-2026, 01:08 AM)ulawz Wrote: They are not identical to the originals and Roblox should not remove the already existing classic faces let alone face accessories or static heads with faces made by people or enforce AI over them.

Furthermore, these dynamic faces are made using AI to make the investors cream themselves over it and it also makes the faces look very bad knockoffs of the originals and nothing like the originals or original artists' intent and runs the art through AI. This is all investor slop.

I support Roblox adding stuff that is good though I would personally never use this investor bait but people can if they want. But I absolutely do not support them removing stuff. (especially decades old things used everywhere in the community)

(03-22-2026, 06:58 AM)Noova Wrote:

(03-22-2026, 01:08 AM)ulawz Wrote: They are not identical to the originals and Roblox should not remove the already existing classic faces let alone face accessories or static heads with faces made by people or enforce AI over them.

Furthermore, these dynamic faces are made using AI to make the investors cream themselves over it and it also makes the faces look very bad knockoffs of the originals and nothing like the originals or original artists' intent and runs the art through AI. This is all investor slop.

I support Roblox adding stuff that is good though I would personally never use this investor bait but people can if they want. But I absolutely do not support them removing stuff. (especially decades old things used everywhere in the community)

They are static I mean they can animate but they can also be turned off just as easily. And your point about looking like the originals is wrong because they've all been updated since that original announcement and they look pretty much identical now

(03-22-2026, 02:18 PM)mnep5 Wrote:

(03-22-2026, 06:58 AM)Noova Wrote:

(03-22-2026, 01:08 AM)ulawz Wrote: They are not identical to the originals and Roblox should not remove the already existing classic faces let alone face accessories or static heads with faces made by people or enforce AI over them.

Furthermore, these dynamic faces are made using AI to make the investors cream themselves over it and it also makes the faces look very bad knockoffs of the originals and nothing like the originals or original artists' intent and runs the art through AI. This is all investor slop.

I support Roblox adding stuff that is good though I would personally never use this investor bait but people can if they want. But I absolutely do not support them removing stuff. (especially decades old things used everywhere in the community)

They are static I mean they can animate but they can also be turned off just as easily. And your point about looking like the originals is wrong because they've all been updated since that original announcement and they look pretty much identical now

You're kind of right there but there should be the option to choose, 2d faces shouldn't be axed entirely

(03-23-2026, 06:42 AM)Noova Wrote:

(03-22-2026, 02:18 PM)mnep5 Wrote:

(03-22-2026, 06:58 AM)Noova Wrote:

(03-22-2026, 01:08 AM)ulawz Wrote: They are not identical to the originals and Roblox should not remove the already existing classic faces let alone face accessories or static heads with faces made by people or enforce AI over them.

Furthermore, these dynamic faces are made using AI to make the investors cream themselves over it and it also makes the faces look very bad knockoffs of the originals and nothing like the originals or original artists' intent and runs the art through AI. This is all investor slop.

I support Roblox adding stuff that is good though I would personally never use this investor bait but people can if they want. But I absolutely do not support them removing stuff. (especially decades old things used everywhere in the community)

They are static I mean they can animate but they can also be turned off just as easily. And your point about looking like the originals is wrong because they've all been updated since that original announcement and they look pretty much identical now

You're kind of right there but there should be the option to choose, 2d faces shouldn't be axed entirely

I understand where you're coming from

(03-23-2026, 05:11 PM)mnep5 Wrote:

(03-23-2026, 06:42 AM)Noova Wrote:

(03-22-2026, 02:18 PM)mnep5 Wrote:

(03-22-2026, 06:58 AM)Noova Wrote:

(03-22-2026, 01:08 AM)ulawz Wrote: They are not identical to the originals and Roblox should not remove the already existing classic faces let alone face accessories or static heads with faces made by people or enforce AI over them.

Furthermore, these dynamic faces are made using AI to make the investors cream themselves over it and it also makes the faces look very bad knockoffs of the originals and nothing like the originals or original artists' intent and runs the art through AI. This is all investor slop.

I support Roblox adding stuff that is good though I would personally never use this investor bait but people can if they want. But I absolutely do not support them removing stuff. (especially decades old things used everywhere in the community)

They are static I mean they can animate but they can also be turned off just as easily. And your point about looking like the originals is wrong because they've all been updated since that original announcement and they look pretty much identical now

You're kind of right there but there should be the option to choose, 2d faces shouldn't be axed entirely

I understand where you're coming from

it would've been better to choose between 2d static faces and 3d animated faces rather than 3d static and animated faces imo